A product of the likelihood that an event will occur and the impact that it will have if it does occur.The probability that an event will occur with beneficial or harmful outcomes for a particular person or others with whom they come into contact.Independent Mental Capacity Act Advocate.In such circumstances it will be necessary to arrange conversations at times that are appropriate for them and/or provide additional support if required such as: When we work with individuals during the risk assessment process it is important to remember that a person’s ability to engage can fluctuate either as a result of a cognitive impairment of the mind or brain or due to physical or emotional difficulties. Identify current and past strategies for managing risks.Identify weighting of risks (to establish high and low risk concerns, impact on emotional, social and psychological wellbeing).Identify risk perspectives from all the people involved.Identify risks in the life-context of the individual and their circumstances (and therefore impact on quality of life and individual wellbeing).However, this further guidance is equally as applicable for working with all individuals: (2011) which outlined a four-stage process for exploring risk with individuals and families living with dementia. This framework is evident in a study undertaken by Clarke et al. Managing risks – risk enablement and planning.Assessing impact and likelihood of risks.Understanding the person's circumstances.The risk assessment process has four distinctive and sequential stages, and social care practitioners should go through each of them with the individual. Risk assessment is an important process in adult social care as we work with individuals to enable them to achieve the outcomes that matter to them and promote their individual wellbeing. If the adult lacks capacity, some of the statements below will not apply, and decisions and agreements will be made with as much involvement as possible from the adult but not solely with them. “Critical, reflexive and careful judgement … with the fully considered evidence of incomplete knowledge so that you can defend and justify your assessments, plans and interventions” (Cooper, 2011).The importance of clearly documenting the entirety of the risk assessment process and particularly evidence associated with risk.That regardless of the method of interaction we should always be mindful of situations that present risk and should try to gather as much information as possible about the individuals’ circumstances to ensure any risks are identified and looked at properly.However, as with any social care practice, it is essential that we are able to defend any decision made with the evidence that underpins it. The importance of being aware that our professional decisions may become more reliant on assumptions or information provided by others, as we may have less ability to observe and draw conclusions from direct observation.The key principles of how to gather evidence and information, so they are able to identify and assess risks virtually when it is not necessary or appropriate to do so through face-to-face contact.This guide will help social care practitioners to understand: Where it is appropriate and proportionate to interact with an individual in a way other than face to face, it is necessary to be confident and competent to practice in a way that recognises and works effectively with risk. Virtual interactions with people that access care and support are here to stay, in one form or another. Risk assessment process and key points to risk identification in virtual interactions
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |